ATS 2019 Virtual Final Program

BEHAVIORAL • CLINICAL YEAR IN REVIEW CME Credits Available: 2 B81 NURSING YEAR IN REVIEW: PATIENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT : New! The Nursing Year in Review Bibliography is only available via the conference website http://conference.thoracic.org/go/nyir or mobile app. Attendees wishing to access the bibliography should bring a smart phone, tablet or laptop to the session Assembly on Nursing 2:15 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. KBHCCD Room D162/D164 (Level 1) Target Audience Clinicians and researchers interested in integrating or enhancing patient and family engagement in their practice or research Objectives At the conclusion of this session, the participant will be able to: • describe new findings of outcomes related to patient and family engagement in select areas of practice and research; • describe barriers to patient and family engagement; • identify methods and have new strategies to enhance patient and family engagement. Speakers in select topic areas will present the state of current research related to patient and family engagement. Focused areas of practice and research will include critical care, asthma, COPD, pediatrics, and sleep. Specifically each presentation will be a synthesis and integration of results across studies with a summary of the state of the science in the area, discussion of implications for research and clinical practice, and identification of gaps. The symposium will conclude with a panel discussion of implications for clinical practice and research to enhance/support patient and family engagement. Chairing: J.L. Guttormson, PhD, Milwaukee, WI A.M. Russell, MScN, London, United Kingdom 2:15 Patient and Family Engagement in Critical Care B.D. Hetland, PhD, RN, CCRN-K, Omaha, NE 2:40 Patient and Family Engagement in Sleep N.S. Redeker, PhD, RN, West Haven, CT 3:05 Patient and Family Engagement in COPD M.C. Kapella, PhD, RN, ATSF, Chicago, IL 3:30 Patient and Family Engagement in Asthma W.M. Gibson-Scipio, PhD, FNP-BC, ATSF, Detroit, MI 3:55 Panel Discussion: Implications for Practice and Research J.L. Guttormson, PhD, Milwaukee, WI CLINICAL CLINICAL TOPICS IN PULMONARY MEDICINE CME Credits Available: 2 B82 PRO/CON: THE CONUNDRUM OF MANAGING ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM Assemblies on Clinical Problems; Critical Care; Pulmonary Circulation 2:15 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. KBHCCD Ballroom C One-Two (Level 2) Target Audience Pulmonary critical care physicians, cardiologists, interventional radiologists, early career professionals, hospital administrators, nurses, physician extenders Objectives At the conclusion of this session, the participant will be able to: • compare, contrast and analyze various evidence based treatment approached for PE management and have insight into multi disciplinary approach and personalized PE care; • identify gaps in current literature, quality improvement and research initiatives to improve, guide and streamline individual practices; • learn new findings about topic areas not adequately addressed in current ACCP, AHA and ESC guidelines and can begin integrating this evidence into the management of their PE patients. This scientific symposium will focus on controversial topics in management of acute pulmonary embolism. It will compare and contrast where ACCP, AHA and ESC guidelines differ in their management of acute PE. It will provide audience how patient with acute PE is approached differently by clinicians with from different medical specialty. The session will conclude with a panel discussion focused on the future direction of the comprehensive multidisciplinary PE management. We will also use ARS throughout session. Chairing: P. Rali, MD, Philadelphia, PA V.F. Tapson, MD, West Hollywood, CA R.N. Channick, MD, Boston, MA 2:15 PRO: Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Should Be Standard of Care for Submassive PE G. Piazza, MD, Boston, MA 2:23 CON: Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Should Not Be standard of Care for Submassive PE V.F. Tapson, MD, West Hollywood, CA 2:31 Rebuttal: Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Should Be Standard of Care for Submassive PE G. Piazza, MD, Boston, MA 2:35 Rebuttal: Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Should Not Be Standard of Care for Submassive PE V.F. Tapson, MD, West Hollywood, CA 2:39 Question and Answer Session: Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive PE R.N. Channick, MD, Boston, MA 2:45 PRO: Systemic Thrombolysis for Submassive PE Improves Outcome D. Jimenez, MD, PhD, Madrid, Spain ATS 2019 • Dallas, TX 198 MONDAY • MAY 20